![]() guring out installations, updates, and problems, post some screenshots from X-Plan, and view free downloads, videos, news, and reviews. Come on in and talk about anything and everything about X-Pilot here. You can delete the preferences folder and run XP (Remember it will delete on the settings ) and start from there, but my advise keep everything to low.Welcome to the X-Pilot Forum, a place to talk all things X-Plane. Though I will be CPU bound because it's an old system but I use other sims like il2 / DCS which are more GPU bound. I am considering a RX 550 4 GB (always preferred AMD GPU to Nvidia ). ![]() You need to keep them on the same settings and then try. The laptop setups with the same config would be on different settings like Power Saving mode etc. But most flights are between 22-30 fps depending on the area and objects I am using a GT630 2GB and I have seen XP off loading most on the CPU if my GPU OC goes crazy and that get's me around 12 fps. Remember XP11 level is way higher in visuals Both CPU / GPU can be strained in XP on max settings. as your onboard GPU is not powerful enough hence can be said that many GPU oriented task are being thrown at the CPU. This is not a fair comparison because FSX is CPU bound. GTX1070 is very expencive card, but also if you got mini-ITX system you may not have PCI-x port for it. The x-plane should consider correct perfomace option with installed GPU as is on the most PC systems. Some of the posts above also note different performance on the 2 matching laptop set ups. It does not have 3D elements that would be GPU intensive, neither is CPU very demanding. On my PC it performs 50 - 80 FPS, so I do not find a reason X-plane would go much less. Also as I remember FSX had improvements only by CPU increase, GPU has no effect. It is a bit odd that reduction from HDR10 to minimum has almost no effect if the GPU is an issue. But upgrading your GPU is really necessary if you want to increase FPS.Ĭould it be the issue is in the X-plane itself? The FSX had the same performance issue until Microsoft released an update. if you hd meshes or high resolution orthophotos). Increasing RAM from 8 to 16GB could also help your performance in some situations (e.g. Changing to a GTX1070 should produce a big increase in fps, provided that you don't set the CPU intensive settings (number of objects and reflection detail) to max. It's the bottleneck and the cause of your low FPS. ![]() In the FSX there is clear difference when change settings and in full set up gives about 50 to 60 fps.ĭesktop system, CPU is i3-7100T, mbo Asus B250i, RAM is 8GB and OS is Windows 10 version 64-bit.Īs the onboard graphic is Intel 630HD that is above recommended older 4000HD, let me know any increase performance you get by change from onboard intel to external graphics like GT730 to GTX 1070. Also in task manager changes in renedering cganges almost none in CPU consumption that is about 50% and graphics use about 86%. The same issue here, whatever I change in settings the framerate does not change much, about 14 fps, it only helps reduce the resolution. but when it gets saturated (full) it can lead to a very hard FPS drop (not just some gentle degradation) as the GPU then needs to start to page VRAM into main computer memory (and if your main RAM is also small - which 8 GB is - then it might get even worse). until there is free space in VRAM, your GPU might perform OK. One more thing: especially VRAM can be a very delicate thing. and thus even on the same computer you can see a very wide range of different FPS depending on what XP11 has to do a t a given moment. Where you are flying (over water, where almost nothing has to be rendered or in the middle of New York)Īircraft (there are very "simple2 aircraft with little FPS impact and there are super complex aircraft which can massively drop your FPS) In a flight simulator (and definitely with X-Plane) there is no such thing as a guaranteed FPS! It relies extremely on a lot of factors like: Yes, that is another very important point which new users (especially new to flight simulation) might not know: Also, how is performance outside of major city, in rural areas where there is only autogen and mesh? If it is better, you may have to limit flying to such areas. The only thing I thought would limit my performance is my VRAM, but that does not seem to hit my performance.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |